News
4dOpinion
The Nation on MSNSamuel Alito Takes Pride in Gay-BashingWith his majority opinion in Mahmoud v. Taylor, Alito gave bigoted parents a big, fat kiss—and changed the nature of public ...
5dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNHow Religious Pluralism Lost at the Supreme CourtThe conservative justices’ ruling in a case involving LGBTQ-themed books in public schools is likely to benefit larger ...
The 6-3 decision Friday in a case brought by parents in Maryland comes as certain books are increasingly being banned from ...
The case involved a school district in Virginia, where right-wing parents were abusing the “opt-out” system meant to allow ...
2don MSN
The Supreme Court declined to take up the issue on Thursday but the two senior Republican appointees sent a message in the ...
6dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNSupreme Court Rules Homophobic Books Bans in Schools Are OKThe Supreme Court determined parents can “opt out” of letting their children see LGBTQ books in the classroom.
4d
Religion News Service on MSN‘We were called book burners’: Families react to SCOTUS LGBTQ+ books decisionWhile not definitive, the decision signals the justices’ inclination to see religious parents succeed in their two-year legal ...
The school district claimed to be teaching “tolerance” — but its real objective was ideological control over every child in ...
On the day before this week’s Independence Day celebrations on July Fourth, I observed the 64th anniversary of the day I ...
Transgender minors. Transgender soldiers. Transgender characters in books. The court's latest term was bursting with fodder ...
Well, well, well! The U.S. Supreme Court actually did an admirable thing with its 6-3 ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor. The judges ...
When Supreme Court justices and even the Ninth Circuit use strong language to rein in activist judges, the end of the imperial judiciary is nigh.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results